Kolkata: Medical Technology Association of India (MTaI), which represents research-based medical technology companies in manufacturing, R&D and training in India, said QCO Orders for medical device regulation do not fit in government’s broader plan to ensure patient safety or lower cost of healthcare.
Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) through the Department of pharmaceuticals (DoP) is in the process of finalising a quality control mechanism for medical devices. It had issued a draft Quality Control Orders (QCO) for six categories of devices including blood glucose monitoring system, surgical blades, gloves, and clinical electric thermometer, seeking stakeholder views. MTaI has submitted its inputs to the government.
“The proposed Quality Control Orders has a limited scope as it does not adequately address all aspects of quality, safety and performance and only covers the product safety standard of medical devices.
Conforming to the order would mean increase in compliance cost for companies that are already adhering to essential checklist requirements of CDSCO or USFDA/CE norms as well as for domestic companies looking to export, since products must first confirm with BIS standards, then qualify for global ISO/IES standards and then go for CE/ USFDA for eligibility for global markets” a MTaI statement said.
The Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO), which is the present regulatory authority for medical devices, certifies a device for usage after a rigorous process of evaluation which includes conformity with standards, real-time clinical data on efficacy, safety and performance of the device.
CDSCO has already embarked on regulating all medical devices under the Drugs & Cosmetic Act as well as under the provisions of newly introduced Medical Device Rules 2017, in a phase-wise manner. A separate vertical consisting of medical device specialists is also being set up for this purpose.
“There is duplication in what CDSCO and the Quality Control Orders seek to do which will lead to multiplicity of authorities as well as increase red tape for medical devices. While our demand for having a separate Act for the regulation of medical device remain, we feel CDSCO should continue taking the lead in regulating the sector as it has the maximum expertise and experience in governing the medical device universe,” MTaI statement added.