Oklahoma judge to rule in opioid lawsuit against JnJ
Lawyers for the state called JnJ an opioid "kingpin" and contended its marketing efforts created a public nuisance in the form of the opioid crisis as doctors over-prescribed the drugs, leading to a surge in overdose deaths in Oklahoma.
U.S: An Oklahoma judge will rule on Monday on whether Johnson & Johnson (JnJ) should be held liable in a lawsuit by the state's attorney general who argues the drugmaker should be forced to pay $17 billion for fueling the opioid epidemic.
Judge Thad Balkman in Norman, Oklahoma, will deliver his decision from the bench after presiding over the first trial to result from thousands of lawsuits by state and local governments against opioid manufacturers and distributors, the court said.
Opioids were involved in almost 400,000 overdose deaths from 1999 to 2017, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Since 2000, some 6,000 Oklahomans have died from opioid overdoses, according to the state's lawyers.
During a seven-week, a non-jury trial that began in May, Oklahoma Attorney General Mike Hunter sought to establish that J&J carried out a years-long marketing campaign that minimized the addictive painkillers' risks while promoting their benefits.
Lawyers for the state called J&J an opioid "kingpin" and contended its marketing efforts created a public nuisance in the form of the opioid crisis as doctors over-prescribed the drugs, leading to a surge in overdose deaths in Oklahoma.
JnJ denied wrongdoing. It contends its painkillers, Duragesic and Nucynta, were a tiny fraction of all opioids prescribed in Oklahoma. It also said its marketing claims had scientific support.
Lawyers for New Jersey-based JnJ also contend in court papers that the state's case rests on "radical theories" disconnected from more than a century of court cases interpreting the state's public nuisance law.
JnJ had no comment on Wednesday.
The case is being closely watched by plaintiffs in other opioid lawsuits, particularly in around 2,000 cases pending before a federal judge in Ohio who has been pushing for a settlement ahead of an October trial.
OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma LP and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd were originally also defendants in the case. Purdue reached a $270 million settlement with Oklahoma in March and Teva settled for $85 million in May. Both deny wrongdoing.
By Nate Raymond
Medical Dialogues Bureau consists of a team of passionate medical/scientific writers, led by doctors and healthcare researchers. Our team efforts to bring you updated and timely news about the important happenings of the medical and healthcare sector. Our editorial team can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org. Check out more about our bureau/team here