Business Medical Dialogues
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • Medical Dialogues
    • Speciality Dialogues
    • Education Dialogues
    • Medical Jobs
    • Medical Matrimony
    • MD Brand Connect
    Business Medical Dialogues
    • News
        • Financial Results
        • Hospitals & Diagnostics
        • IT / Health Venture
        • Implants / Devices
        • Insurance
        • Key Movement
        • Pharmaceuticals
        • Policy
        • Technology
        • pharma-news
    • blog
    LoginRegister
    Business Medical Dialogues
    LoginRegister
    • Home
    • News
      • Financial Results
      • Hospitals & Diagnostics
      • IT / Health Venture
      • Implants / Devices
      • Insurance
      • Key Movement
      • Pharmaceuticals
      • Policy
      • Technology
      • pharma-news
    • blog
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Delhi High Court:...

    Delhi High Court: Roche asked to explain stand on Avastin copy

    Written by Geeta Sharma Sharma Published On 2016-05-26T14:17:00+05:30  |  Updated On 26 May 2016 2:17 PM IST
    Delhi High Court: Roche asked to explain stand on Avastin copy
    The Delhi High Court has questioned the swiss drug maker Roche for suing the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI), and Hyderabad-based Hetero Drugs, over the approval process for a bio similar of biotech cancer drug- bevacizumab.

    Roche is the original inventor of the drug, which is a cancer drug, sold under the name of Avastin. The company has argued that Hetero’s drug is not a bio similar to bevacizumab and therefore, claims of this nature cannot be made by the company to promote their drug in India.

    Justice Valmiki Mehta not quite convinced about the authenticity of the case, has asked Roche’s counsel to submit documents in justification of the company’s civil suit move. The issues that the hon'ble judge has outlined to be replied to are:

    • Roche’s right to file a civil suit in the face of the fact that the drug maker does not have a patent for the drug in India;

    • The company also has to prove that it has a personal interest at stake, and that Hetero’s new drug being granted government approval would have an impact on Roche.


    Justice Mehta has also asked Hetero’s Counsel Abhishek Singhvi to submit arguments in his company’s defence on June 2, 2016, the date of the next hearing reports Economic Times.

    "Bevacizumab is a descriptive term which describes that particular drug," Mehta said. "Since you're not an owner of a registered patent in India, (Hetero) can in fact (copy the drug)," he told Roche's counsel, Kapil Sibal.

    Hetero Drugs wrongly obtained statutory permission for the drug and would mislead the public by calling its drug a bevacizumab biosimilar, affecting Roche's reputation in the process as the Swiss firm was the inventor of the drug, argued Sibal.

    Sibal also argued that despite clinical trials of the drug having been skipped the government's Subject Expert Committee (SEC) recommended Hetero's drug as a bevacizumab biosimilar for use in metastatic colorectal cancer.

    Roche’s Avastin has earned $7 billion through sale globally. The drug treats debilitating ailments like colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, kidney cancer and ovarian cancer. Hetero Drugs and Intas Pharmaceuticals are the two companies that have been granted an SEC recommendation for approval for a bevacizumab bio similar.

    However a technical committee along with an apex committee have to be gone through with, by the companies, before the DCGI can grant their drugs a bio similar status.
    Abhishek SinghviAvastinbevacizumabcancer drugDCGIDelhi high courtHeteroIntas PharmaceuticalsJustice Valmiki MehtaKapil SibalRoche
    Source : Inputs from the Economic Times

    Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2020 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

    Geeta Sharma Sharma
    Geeta Sharma Sharma
      Show Full Article
      Next Story
      Similar Posts
      NO DATA FOUND

      Popular Stories

      • Email: info@medicaldialogues.in
      • Phone: 011 - 4372 0751

      Website Last Updated On : 13 Oct 2022 5:14 AM GMT
      Company
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Our Team
      • Reach our Editor
      • Feedback
      • Submit Article
      Ads & Legal
      • Advertise
      • Advertise Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Editorial Policy
      • Comments Policy
      • Disclamier
      Medical Dialogues is health news portal designed to update medical and healthcare professionals but does not limit/block other interested parties from accessing our general health content. The health content on Medical Dialogues and its subdomains is created and/or edited by our expert team, that includes doctors, healthcare researchers and scientific writers, who review all medical information to keep them in line with the latest evidence-based medical information and accepted health guidelines by established medical organisations of the world.

      Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription.Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. You can check out disclaimers here. © 2025 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

      © 2025 - Medical Dialogues. All Rights Reserved.
      Powered By: Hocalwire
      X
      We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok